"There's no evidence"
"We can't act without concrete proof."
Students are told their word isn't enough. Witnesses are dismissed. Digital harassment vanishes into "he said, she said." The burden of proof falls on traumatized children.
Students asked for help. They reported bullying. They disclosed harassment. They followed the rules. And ISD 110 looked the other way.
When students at Waconia Public Schools report bullying or harassment, they're met with institutional defenses designed to minimize liability—not maximize safety.
"We can't act without concrete proof."
Students are told their word isn't enough. Witnesses are dismissed. Digital harassment vanishes into "he said, she said." The burden of proof falls on traumatized children.
"We've addressed it with the student involved."
A brief conversation with the perpetrator is treated as resolution. No consequences, no follow-up, no changed behavior. Students are told the issue is "handled" while harassment continues unchanged.
"Our policies dictate how we can respond."
Policies become shields for inaction. When rules don't fit the situation, students are told nothing can be done. The system protects itself, not the vulnerable.
"These things take time to handle properly."
Investigations stretch for weeks or months while harassment continues. Updates are vague. Outcomes are confidential. Students wait in limbo, unprotected.
"Sometimes the best response is no response."
Waconia administrators suggest students simply "don't engage" or "rise above it." The responsibility to manage abuse is placed on victims, not perpetrators.
"Can you provide exact dates, times, and witnesses?"
Students are interrogated for precise details of traumatic events. When memories are unclear or incomplete, ISD 110 uses this as justification to dismiss reports entirely. The trauma response becomes evidence against the victim.
Behind every institutional excuse is a student who tried to do the right thing—and was failed.
You tell yourself it will get better if you just report it. You gather the courage. You walk into that office. You explain what's happening—the messages, the looks, the way your stomach drops when you see them in the hallway.
And then you hear it: "We'll look into it." Or "Are you sure that's what happened?" Or "Have you thought about how this might affect them?"
Suddenly, you're the problem. You're making things complicated. You're being dramatic. You're threatening someone's future. The harassment continues, but now you're carrying something heavier: the knowledge that when you needed protection, Waconia Public Schools chose paperwork over people.
You stop eating lunch in the cafeteria. You take different routes between classes. You become smaller, quieter, invisible—because the system taught you that your safety is your own responsibility. ISD 110 taught you that institutions don't exist to protect you. They exist to protect themselves.
— A student's reality at Waconia Public Schools
Your voice doesn't matter when the system has already decided the outcome
You're questioned, doubted, and made responsible for managing your own abuse
The institution you trusted becomes another space where you're not safe
The people whose job is to protect you choose policy, reputation, and liability instead
Real change at Waconia Public Schools / ISD 110 requires more than policy updates. It requires a fundamental shift in priorities—from institutional protection to student protection.
When a student reports harassment or bullying at ISD 110, the default response should be belief and support—not skepticism. Investigations should happen alongside protection, not instead of it.
Why it matters: Students shouldn't have to prove their trauma to deserve safety.
While investigations proceed, Waconia Public Schools must provide immediate accommodations: adjusted schedules, no-contact orders, and escort services. Victims shouldn't continue facing their harassers in hallways.
Why it matters: Safety can't wait for bureaucratic processes to conclude.
Students and families deserve regular updates, clear timelines, and meaningful communication from ISD 110. Confidentiality shouldn't mean silence toward those who reported.
Why it matters: Being left in the dark compounds trauma and erodes trust.
If harassment happens outside school but impacts the learning environment, ISD 110 has a responsibility to act. Geographic technicalities shouldn't shield perpetrators.
Why it matters: Students don't stop being students when they leave campus.
Consequences for perpetrators at Waconia Public Schools should focus on changed behavior, not just punishment. Restorative justice programs and mandatory education on consent, respect, and harm can break cycles.
Why it matters: Accountability isn't just about consequences—it's about preventing future harm.
ISD 110 should establish independent review boards with community and student representation to evaluate how reports are handled. Internal accountability isn't enough.
Why it matters: Power unchecked perpetuates the same failures.
Waconia Public Schools should admit when the system has failed students, apologize without qualification, and commit to specific changes. Transparency builds trust.
Why it matters: Accountability begins with honesty.
Systemic change doesn't happen without pressure. It requires community awareness, vocal advocacy, and a refusal to accept "that's just how it is."
If you're a student, parent, educator, or community member who believes Waconia Public Schools / ISD 110 can do better—speak up. Demand transparency. Attend school board meetings. Support students who come forward.
Email the Superintendent